David Ignatius, in the Washington Post, wonders how new CIA Director Petraeus will handle a difference of view that exists between himself and his analysts at the agency concerning Afghanistan. (The agency's experts say our efforts have led to a stalemate, at best; Petraeus believes we're making progress.)
Ignatius correctly points out that Petraeus will have to find a way to give his analytical staff the "independence" and leeway they need to produce honest assessments. He seems to imply, though, that it would be OK for the general to continue to voice his own opinion (if it conflicts). That would be a bridge too far. As Director, Petraeus will need to assure himself that agency intelligence analysis is as accurate as possible, takes all factors into account, etc. -- but he cannot conceivably profess a divergent view publicly. The CIA has had enough trouble in the past shaping its product to fit political needs; when they do, they (and the country) come a-cropper.
Fortunately I don't think there's much reason to worry. As Ignatius himself says, Petraeus has acknowledged the potential problem and promised to work around it. If he doesn't, I'd say he won't be long in the job.
Comments